The drug known as Mounjaro (generic name: tirzepatide), developed by Eli Lilly and Company for type 2 diabetes (and increasingly used off-label for weight loss), has recently become the subject of a wave of product-liability suits in the U.S. Legal action is still evolving—but the issues raised, the legal theories advanced, and the potential claims are significant. This article gives a U.S. law-expert overview of the Mounjaro lawsuits: their basis, current status, key allegations, legal challenges and advice for potential claimants.
What is Mounjaro and Why the Lawsuits?

Mounjaro was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2022 for type 2 diabetes. Its active ingredient, tirzepatide, works as a GLP-1 receptor agonist (and somewhat more) to reduce blood sugar and, as a side effect, produce weight loss. While the drug has proven popular and commercially successful, a rising number of users allege serious side-effects which were either not properly disclosed or not reasonably foreseeable by the manufacturer.
Some of the principal complaints include severe gastrointestinal issues (such as gastroparesis—stomach paralysis), intestinal obstruction, bile/gallbladder complications, and other digestive-system harms. Plaintiffs allege that Eli Lilly failed to warn adequately about these risks, or continued to market the drug as safe without sufficient disclosure of the potential for serious injury.
Key Legal Allegations & Theories
The lawsuits centering on Mounjaro (and other GLP-1 drugs) rely on several familiar product liability and pharmaceutical liability legal theories:
- Failure to Warn / Inadequate Labeling: Plaintiffs claim Eli Lilly knew or should have known of serious gastrointestinal and other risks associated with Mounjaro, yet did not provide adequate warnings or instructions to physicians and patients.
- Misrepresentation / Marketing Claims: Some suits allege that Eli Lilly marketed Mounjaro (or allowed it to be used) for weight loss or off-label in such a way that understated the potential risks, or failed to properly convey the severity of side-effects.
- Negligence / Strict Liability for Design or Manufacturing Defect: Less frequently, plaintiffs may argue that the drug was defectively designed (i.e., the risk profile was unreasonable) or manufactured with inadequate warnings. For example, a claim may be that the side-effects (such as stomach paralysis) were foreseeable and should have been guarded against more rigorously.
- Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) Consolidation: Many of the suits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in federal court which allows coordinated discovery and motion practice.
Current Status & What the Numbers Indicate
As of mid-2025, the litigation is building momentum:
- There are thousands of lawsuits pending in the federal MDL involving Mounjaro and related GLP-1 drugs. For example, as of October 1, 2025, there were approximately 2,809 pending actions in the MDL.
- Official updates note that label changes have been made: in June 2025, the FDA approved updates to Mounjaro’s label including warnings about acute kidney injury, especially in the context of GI adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting or diarrhea.
- Specific patient complaints have been filed: e.g., a Louisiana woman claimed multiple hospitalizations, vomiting, stomach pain, and long-term injury after taking Mounjaro and initially another GLP-1 drug.
- The lawsuits remain largely in the pre-trial/discovery state; no large public mass settlements or verdicts have yet made headlines for Mounjaro specifically (at least publicly) as of this writing.
Legal Challenges & Hurdles
For plaintiffs, pursuing a Mounjaro lawsuit presents several notable legal hurdles:
- Causation: Plaintiffs must show a causal link between use of Mounjaro and the alleged injury (for example, gastroparesis or bowel obstruction). Given digestive issues may have multiple causes, the plaintiff must secure expert medical testimony tying the drug to the injury.
- Knowledge / Warning Duty: It must be shown that Eli Lilly either knew or should have known of the risk and failed to warn. If the alleged risk was unknown or unforeseeable, the manufacturer may not be liable.
- Label Changes / Timing: If warnings were updated and the plaintiff used the drug thereafter, comparative fault or failure to heed warnings may be a defense.
- Statute of Limitations / Jurisdictional Variations: Product-liability claim time limits vary by state. Plaintiffs must act promptly to preserve rights.
- Selection of Suitable Cases (Bellwether Trials): Because the MDL is large, bellwether or test cases will often determine how other claims are valued. What the parties agree in early trials or settlement negotiations will shape expectations.
What Can Potential Claimants Do?
If you believe you suffered a serious injury after taking Mounjaro, here are steps to consider:
- Seek medical documentation: Diagnosis of conditions like gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, gallbladder removal, acute kidney injury, etc., with timeline showing onset after drug use.
- Gather prescription history: Dates of Mounjaro use, dosages, any transitions from other GLP-1 drugs.
- Keep detailed medical & expense records: Hospitalizations, surgeries, treatments, lost wages, pain and suffering.
- Contact an experienced product-liability attorney: Especially one with experience in pharmaceutical MDLs and class/mass torts.
- Act promptly: Statute of limitations starts to run from the date of injury or discovery of injury; delays can jeopardize claims.
- Monitor the litigation developments: Label changes, judicial rulings, settlement trends may affect your case’s value and strategy.
Conclusion
The Mounjaro lawsuits signal a major emerging wave of pharmaceutical litigation tied to GLP-1 drugs—driven by allegations that manufacturers failed to adequately warn about serious gastrointestinal, gallbladder, kidney and other potential risks. While the litigation is still relatively young and no definitive large-scale settlement has yet become public for Mounjaro injuries, the framework is in place: multidistrict litigation, bridging discovery, and increasing numbers of claimants.
If you or a loved one used Mounjaro and experienced significant medical complications, the legal path is open—but it demands careful preparation, strong medical evidence, and timely action. With the law still evolving, each case will rely on its specific facts; consulting competent legal counsel is highly advisable.

Oliver Johnson is LawScroller’s Senior Legal Correspondent specializing in civil litigation, class actions, and consumer lawsuit coverage. He breaks down complex settlements and court decisions into clear, practical guidance for readers.